🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.