🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming small “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but very loyal friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based entertainment facility have become pawns in a tussle between a defunct facility, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those closest to the whales say the impassioned controversy over their destiny often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the Canadian government blocked the transfer of the belugas to China, the controversial attraction near the famous falls where they are kept warned to put them down unless the government funds the upkeep of keeping them alive. Canada’s fisheries minister has denied that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain position.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Scientists say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their sound replication, problem solving and communal behavior point to they are deeply intelligent animals – something Kristy Burgess observed personally.

Burgess spent three years as a whale caretaker, a role that required building relationships of the marine predators.

“Building up those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and fulfilling.”

Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was even so surprised by the details and quirks in their characters. She cultivated a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting natures.

“One whale accepted me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Both changed the way I understand connection.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Her connection with the whales progressed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their enclosure.

During her three years at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, succumbed. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the facility ascribes to natural mortality, but which advocates say points to the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The facility did not open to the guests over the summer, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand results of the closure. “Concrete is breaking off from the tanks because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and move about with chunks in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not respond to a inquiry, but in the past asserted: “The whales … obtain far better veterinary services and 24/7 supervision than any human in the Britain, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was fired from the park in recent months following the passing of a beluga, an ailing beluga the park staff had to humanely kill. She said the park believed particulars of the incident were leaked to the press and she was let go soon after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and staff members in anguish. She says the park’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” endeavor, adding any efforts to euthanize even a individual beluga would require “considerable personnel”, equipment and specialized tools.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess supports demands for the whales to be removed immediately from the facility, with its failing enclosures and shrinking team.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official turned down a bid to send the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the proposal would have meant a perpetual situation in captivity and a reversion to public entertainment,” the official stated. “As society, we know that whales should be in the ocean, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in clear conscience approve an relocation that would perpetuate the treatment these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s remarks reflect a broader lack of awareness of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.

“The public needs to understand these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As authorities struggle to find a solution, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be freed into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A suggested refuge in the region of eastern Canada, which has received government approval, has proven most controversial. The prospective site, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain positive that it could ultimately represent a sustainable solution for some of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Others say the prospect of a refuge indicates a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a viable solution in the short term.

The project lead, leader of the initiative, said the location will replicate the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales get from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|